from graphviz import Graph, Digraph
Below is a binary tree, cleaned up from last time.
Remember that a tree is a directed graph. It has one root without a parent. Every other node has a parent. Nodes without children are called leaves.
This tree is a binary tree because each node has at most two children.
class Node: def __init__(self, val): self.val = val self.left = None self.right = None def to_graphviz(self, g=None): if g == None: g = Digraph() # draw self g.node(repr(self.val)) for label, child in [("L", self.left), ("R", self.right)]: if child != None: # draw child, recursively child.to_graphviz(g) # draw edge from self to child g.edge(repr(self.val), repr(child.val), label=label) return g def _repr_svg_(self): return self.to_graphviz()._repr_svg_() root = Node("A") root.left = Node("B") root.right = Node("C") root.left.left = Node("Y") root.left.right = Node("X") root.right.right = Node("Z") root
What if we want to check whether a tree contains a value? We know it does if one of the following is true:
Let's write a recursive function,
contains, to do this search. At each step, we'll display the subtree being searched.
from IPython.core.display import display, HTML def contains(node, target): if node == None: return False display(HTML("Is the root %s?" % target)) display(node) if node.val == target: return True return contains(node.left, target) or contains(node.right, target) contains(root, "B")
Cool, we found the value in the second place we looked because we check left first. What if the data is deep on the right side? Worse, what if the thing we're searching for isn't even in the tree? Let's try that:
Ouch, that was slow. It would be great if we could determine that an entry isn't in the tree without needing to look at every entry.
One way we can guarantee this is if every value in a left subtree is less than the value of the parent and every value in the right subtree is greater than the value of the parent.
Let's create a function for adding values that guarantees this.
# TODO: make this a method... def add(node, val): if node.val == val: return # no duplicates elif val < node.val: if node.left != None: add(node.left, val) else: node.left = Node(val) else: if node.right != None: add(node.right, val) else: node.right = Node(val)
root = Node("C") root
add(root, "A") root
# duplicate shouldn't be added add(root, "A") root
add(root, "B") root
add(root, "E") root
add(root, "D1") root
add(root, "D2") root
add(root, "F") root
Now that we've built a search tree, we can write a method for efficiently searching it. It's like the previous
contains function, but now we only need to check one child instead of checking both each time.
def contains(node, target): if node == None: return False display("Is the root %s?" % target) display(node) if node.val == target: return True if target < node.val: display("Go Left") return contains(node.left, target) else: display("Go Right") return contains(node.right, target) contains(root, "D2")
'Is the root D2?'
'Is the root D2?'
'Is the root D2?'
'Is the root D2?'
For the previous lookups, using a Python set would probably do about as well. But what if we want get all the values in some range?
We can write a similar function. But now, we'll sometimes need to search both sides (depending on the width of the range).
Rather than returning found values, we can accumulate everything in a list.
def range_query(node, lower, upper, results=None): if results == None: results =  if node == None: return results display("Is the root %s between %s and %s" % (node.val, str(lower), str(upper))) if lower <= node.val <= upper: display("YES") results.append(node.val) else: display("NO") display(node) if lower < node.val: range_query(node.left, lower, upper, results) if upper > node.val: range_query(node.right, lower, upper, results) return results range_query(root, "D1", "D9")
'Is the root C between D1 and D9'
'Is the root E between D1 and D9'
'Is the root D1 between D1 and D9'
'Is the root D2 between D1 and D9'
If the depth of all nodes are roughly equal, the time to check a values will be O(log N), which is pretty great! But the insertion order matters a lot. Let's consider these 8 numbers:
nums1 = list(range(20)) nums1
[0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19]
from numpy import random nums2 = nums1[:] # shallow copy random.seed(320) random.shuffle(nums2) nums2
[17, 9, 4, 18, 12, 7, 0, 6, 11, 15, 16, 3, 8, 1, 14, 19, 5, 10, 2, 13]
tree1 = Node(nums1) for num in nums1[1:]: add(tree1, num) tree2 = Node(nums2) for num in nums2[1:]: add(tree2, num)
# lookup with be very slow! tree1
# a bit better! tree2
The second tree is definitely a lot more balanced than the first. If we really want to measure this, we would like to identify openings that are shallower than the deepest nodes.
def nearest_open(node): if node is None: return 0 return min(nearest_open(node.left), nearest_open(node.right)) + 1 def max_depth(node): if node is None or (node.left is None and node.right is None): return 0 return 1 + max(max_depth(node.left), max_depth(node.right)) nearest_open(tree2), max_depth(tree2)
def is_balanced(node): return nearest_open(node) >= max_depth(node)
# test is_balanced t = Node("B") t.left = Node("A") t.right = Node("C") b
t.right.right = Node("D") display(t) is_balanced(t)
t.right.right.right = Node("E") display(t) is_balanced(t)
In this reading, we have seen that a binary tree is a BST (Binary Search Tree) if all the left descendents of a node have lesser values than the node, and all the right descendents have greater values. Binary search trees allow us to find values and ranges of values without checking every node.
In a perfectly balanced tree, looking for a single item is O(log N). A tree if balanced if there are no nodes that could be moved closer to the root.
Randomizing insertion order can improve balance. There are also algorithms (not covered) to rearrange trees as values are inserted, maintaining balance (perhaps within some tolerance).